help to better help you:

Please: add always Joomla / JEM version and details to your posts, so we can try to reproduce your issue!

Feature requests for JEM 2.0 - initial public release

JEM-plugin for Acymailing

JEM-plugin for Acymailing

11 years 6 months ago
#9635
Hi, there is an eventlist plugin for Acymailing which works on Joomla 2.5+
(it's not free)
They wrote they will be interested to adapt it to JEM:
We will handle a new series of integration in August, we could include JEM to our list of upcoming integration if you feel the database structure is stable enough...
Or if you have questions about our integration system, I will be happy to help you...

Best Regards,
Adrien

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: JEM-plugin for Acymailing

11 years 6 months ago
#9637
@jojo

it's good to hear that they are willing to adapt things.

Like they are saying it's about the table structure and that's not that hard to adapt. The problem is that the tables can change between JEM1.9 and further and that can lead to problems. But that's why we're having version numbers :)

Unfortunately it's a version you have to pay for. Perhaps we can do something with a free version (like jmailalerts) as a newsletter is nice to have.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: JEM-plugin for Acymailing

11 years 6 months ago
#9639
Not sure if the table structure can be defined as stable just yet :D
Repository: Github // Issues: Github // Languages: Transifex

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: JEM-plugin for Acymailing

11 years 6 months ago - 11 years 6 months ago
#9640
@diesl: why so negative? I find it's quite good!
Last edit: 11 years 6 months ago by jojo12.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: JEM-plugin for Acymailing

11 years 6 months ago - 11 years 6 months ago
#9647
Bluefox wrote: it's about the table structure. The problem is that the tables can change between JEM1.9 and further and that can lead to problems.
Ideally they would not directly query the database but use the model to get the data.

jojo12 wrote: @diesl: why so negative? I find it's quite good!
Was not meant negative, but there is certainly room for improvement. Column names for example, could be polished up.
Repository: Github // Issues: Github // Languages: Transifex
Last edit: 11 years 6 months ago by diesl.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.504 seconds